Module 1 • Topic 6

Feasibility Analysis

Evaluate whether a product idea is technically feasible, financially viable, and desirable using TAM/SAM/SOM, Business Model Canvas, and risk frameworks.

The Desirability-Feasibility-Viability (DFV) Framework

Before committing resources to building a product, PMs must validate three intersecting dimensions:

Desirability: Does the user actually want or need this? Will customers pay the proposed price? This is about demand — validated through user research, interviews, surveys, and smoke tests.

Feasibility: Can we actually build it? Is the technology mature enough? Does the organisation have the required skills, infrastructure, and capacity? This is about capability — validated through technical prototyping, TRL assessment, and resource analysis.

Before committing resources to building a product, PMs must validate three intersecting dimensions:

Desirability: Does the user actually want or need this? Will customers pay the proposed price? This is about demand — validated through user research, interviews, surveys, and smoke tests.

Feasibility: Can we actually build it? Is the technology mature enough? Does the organisation have the required skills, infrastructure, and capacity? This is about capability — validated through technical prototyping, TRL assessment, and resource analysis.

Viability: Does the business model make financial sense? Can the company sustain this product profitably over time? This is about sustainability — validated through unit economics, revenue projections, and competitive analysis.

DFV Intersections

A product that scores high on all three dimensions is ready to build. But partial scores reveal specific strategic responses:

CombinationMeaningPM Response
High D + High V + Low FCustomers want it, business model works, but technology can't deliverFind a technically feasible subset (MVP), validate demand with it, build toward full vision iteratively
High D + High F + Low VCustomers want it, you can build it, but it's not profitableRethink pricing, cost structure, or monetisation model
High F + High V + Low DYou can build it profitably, but nobody wants itPivot the value proposition or target a different segment
Exam Alert: When Desirability and Viability are strong but Feasibility is weak, do NOT launch a degraded experience (risks brand trust) or shelve entirely (wastes validated demand). Find the MVP that is technically feasible.

Market Sizing: TAM → SAM → SOM

Market sizing quantifies the revenue opportunity and is critical for investor pitches, resource allocation, and strategic planning.

TAM — Total Addressable Market

The largest possible market if you captured 100% of all potential customers. Based on secondary research from credible sources (Gartner, Forrester, Statista, industry reports).

Market sizing quantifies the revenue opportunity and is critical for investor pitches, resource allocation, and strategic planning.

TAM — Total Addressable Market

The largest possible market if you captured 100% of all potential customers. Based on secondary research from credible sources (Gartner, Forrester, Statista, industry reports).

Avika Example: India mental health market = $3 billion TAM.

SAM — Serviceable Addressable Market

The portion of TAM you can actually reach with your specific product, given geographic, demographic, and product limitations.

Avika Example: Working adults aged 20–65 in India = $1.8 billion SAM (filtered from $3B TAM).

SOM — Serviceable Obtainable Market

The realistic slice of SAM you can capture — typically 1–10% for startups. This is your actual revenue target.

Avika Example: 3% of SAM = $54 million SOM.

Nesting: TAM > SAM > SOM. Always. SOM is what goes into your financial projections.

Calculation Example (Ed-Tech)

  • TAM: 300 million students aged 15–25 in India
  • SAM: 60 million with reliable internet + English proficiency
  • SOM: 1.5% of SAM = 60M × 0.015 = 0.9 million students in Year 1
  • Defensible SAM Calculation

    Investors push back on lazy SAM estimates. For an English-language online coding bootcamp targeting Indian working professionals:

  • Start with working professionals seeking upskilling
  • Filter by willingness to pay for online education
  • Filter by English-language preference
  • Filter by coding/tech interest
  • Using GDP ratios to scale global figures is too crude. Including offline/K-12 segments inflates beyond the serviceable segment. TAM ≠ SAM.


    Top-Down vs Bottom-Up Forecasting

    Top-Down: Start with the total market size and narrow down by applying percentage filters. Fast but often unreliable — "5% of a $50B market" sounds compelling but lacks validation.

    Bottom-Up: Build estimates from specific, identifiable customer segments, calculate individual segment potential, and aggregate. More reliable because it is grounded in concrete, verifiable assumptions.

    Avika Example (Bottom-Up): IT companies (X employees × Y penetration rate) + BPO companies + airlines + hotels + private banks + healthcare institutions = total SOM validated from multiple segments. Multiple methods confirmed 3% market penetration as realistic.


    Business Model Canvas (BMC)

    The BMC (Alexander Osterwalder) is a one-page strategic tool with nine building blocks:

    BlockDescription
    Customer SegmentsWho are your target customers?
    Value PropositionsWhat value do you deliver to each segment?
    ChannelsHow do you reach and deliver value to customers?
    Customer RelationshipsWhat type of relationship does each segment expect?
    Revenue StreamsHow does the business earn money?
    Key ResourcesWhat assets are required to deliver the value proposition?
    Key ActivitiesWhat critical activities must the business perform?
    Key PartnersWho are the essential external partners/suppliers?
    Cost StructureWhat are the major cost drivers?
    Exam Alert: "Unfair Advantage" is NOT one of the nine BMC blocks — it belongs to the Lean Canvas.

    Lean Canvas vs Business Model Canvas

    The Lean Canvas (Ash Maurya) adapts the BMC specifically for startups by replacing blocks that are less relevant in early-stage ventures:

    BMC Block (Removed)Lean Canvas Block (Added)
    Customer RelationshipsProblem (+ Existing Alternatives)
    Key PartnersSolution
    Key ActivitiesKey Metrics
    Key ResourcesUnfair Advantage

    Why the change? Startups should NOT rely on partnerships before validating the core model (Key Partners removed). They need to articulate the problem clearly (Problem added), identify what to measure (Key Metrics added), and identify defensibility (Unfair Advantage added).

    Living Document: The Lean Canvas is explicitly designed to be iterative, not fixed. When Design Thinking empathy research reveals a deeper problem than the initial hypothesis, updating the canvas is the correct response — not preserving the original narrative.


    Revenue Models

    ModelHow It WorksExamples
    SubscriptionRecurring payments (monthly/annual)Netflix, Spotify, SaaS tools
    FreemiumBasic features free, premium features paidSlack, Dropbox, LinkedIn
    Usage-BasedPay per use/consumptionAWS, Twilio, cloud computing
    MarketplaceCommission on transactions between buyers and sellersAmazon, Uber, Airbnb
    AdvertisingRevenue from displaying ads to usersGoogle Search, Facebook, YouTube
    Crowdsourcing/AuctionsFacilitation fees on user-generated transactionseBay, Kickstarter

    Avika Example: ₹1,200/employee/year with 10% volume discounts for larger companies = subscription-based B2B SaaS model.


    Key Financial Metrics

    MetricFormula/DefinitionWhy It Matters
    ARPUAverage Revenue Per UserRevenue efficiency per customer
    CLTVCustomer Lifetime Value — total revenue from a customer over their lifetimeGuides acquisition spending limits
    CACCustomer Acquisition Cost — total sales & marketing spend / new customers acquiredMust be significantly less than CLTV
    Churn Rate% of customers who stop using the product in a given periodInverse of retention; high churn kills growth

    Golden Rule: CLTV should be at least 3× CAC for a sustainable business model. If CAC > CLTV, you lose money on every customer acquired.


    Sales Funnel Conversion Model

    The sales funnel shows dramatic narrowing at each stage:

    StageTypical Conversion Rate
    Unqualified → Qualified~50%
    Qualified Lead → Meeting~30%
    Meeting → Proposal~15%
    Proposal → Win~5%

    Implication: If you need 10 closed deals, you need approximately 200 unqualified leads entering the top of the funnel (200 × 50% × 30% × 15% × 5% ≈ 10).


    Total Revenue Formula

    Total Revenue = Unit Price × Number of Units × Conversion Rate

    This basic formula is the foundation for revenue forecasting. Each variable can be further decomposed: Unit Price may include tiered pricing; Number of Units comes from SOM estimates; Conversion Rate comes from funnel analysis.


    Cost vs Impact Matrix

    Features and investments are plotted on two axes: Impact (Y-axis) and Cost (X-axis).

    Low CostHigh Cost
    High Impact✅ Quick Wins — Prioritise immediately (best ROI)📋 Major Projects — Plan and justify with business case
    Low Impact🤔 Fill-Ins — Consider if resources are available🚫 Time Sinks — Avoid entirely
    Exam Alert: Low Impact + High Cost = Time Sink. The recommendation is always to AVOID, not to "plan for later." This is the most testable quadrant.

    Risk Assessment Grid

    The Risk Assessment Grid prioritises assumptions and risks based on two axes:

  • X-axis: Level of Uncertainty (how unsure are we?)
  • Y-axis: Impact if Wrong (how bad if the assumption fails?)
  • Priority: Test high-uncertainty, high-impact assumptions FIRST using validation methods. Low-uncertainty, low-impact assumptions can be accepted without testing.


    Validation Methods

    Smoke Testing

    Present the product offer to potential customers and track engagement (clicks, sign-ups, willingness to pay) before building the full product. It validates demand with minimal investment.

    Example: A landing page describing the product with a "Sign Up" button. If 500 visitors produce 50 sign-ups (10% conversion), demand is validated. If only 2 sign up, rethink.

    Rapid Prototyping

    Build quick, low-fidelity versions to test core assumptions before full development. Can be wireframes, clickable prototypes, or concierge MVPs (manually delivering the service to validate demand before automating).


    Technology Readiness Levels (TRL)

    TRL is a 1–9 scale assessing technology maturity:

    Level RangeStageDescription
    TRL 1–3Basic ResearchProof of concept, laboratory validation
    TRL 4–6DevelopmentTechnology validated in relevant environment
    TRL 7–9DeploymentSystem demonstrated and operational in real conditions

    TRL helps PMs make go/no-go decisions on incorporating emerging technologies. A TRL 3 technology may be exciting but is too immature for a production product launch.


    AI in Feasibility Analysis

    AI assists across all three feasibility domains:

    DomainAI Application
    Technical FeasibilityScan APIs, generate system architectures, assess integration complexity
    Business FeasibilitySimulate unit economics, project revenue scenarios, benchmark against similar startups
    Market FeasibilityAnalyse demand patterns, simulate user onboarding flows, predict adoption curves

    Financial Calculations

    Net Present Value (NPV)

    NPV accounts for the time value of money — ₹1 today is worth more than ₹1 next year.

    Formula: NPV = –Initial Investment + Σ (Cash Flow_t / (1 + r)^t)

    Example: Initial investment = ₹10 lakhs. Year 1 cash flow = ₹5 lakhs. Year 2 = ₹8 lakhs. Discount rate = 10%.

    NPV = –10 + 5/(1.10)¹ + 8/(1.10)² = –10 + 4.5455 + 6.6116 = ₹1.16 lakhs

    A positive NPV means the project creates value above the required return rate — it is financially viable.

    Payback Period

    The time required to recover the initial investment.

    Formula: Payback Period = Initial Investment / Annual Cash Flow

    Example: ₹24 lakhs investment ÷ ₹6 lakhs/year = 4 years payback period.

    Shorter payback = lower risk. Investors typically want payback within 2–5 years depending on the industry.


    Ten Types of Innovation Framework

    Innovation is not limited to product features. The Ten Types of Innovation framework categorises innovation across three domains:

    DomainInnovation Types
    Configuration (inner workings)Profit Model (changing revenue structure), Network/Partnerships (strategic alliances), Structure (organisational redesign), Process (internal development improvements)
    Offering (core product)Product Performance, Product System
    Experience (customer-facing)Service, Channel, Brand, Customer Engagement, UI redesign
    Exam Alert: A UI redesign is an Experience innovation, not a Configuration innovation. Profit model changes and partnership changes are Configuration.

    Build vs Buy Decision

    When evaluating whether to build an AI feature in-house or buy a third-party API:

    FactorFavours BUILDFavours BUY
    DataProprietary data creates a defensible moatGeneric data, no unique advantage
    CostLong-term cost advantage at scaleNeed rapid deployment within weeks
    IntegrationDeep fine-tuning and customisation requiredStandard API integration sufficient
    TeamML expertise available in-houseNo ML resources or expertise
    TimelineCan afford 3–6 month development cycleNeed it live within 2 weeks

    🧠 Must-Know for the Quiz

  • DFV: Desirability = user want/need, Feasibility = can we build it, Viability = financial sense
  • TAM > SAM > SOM: TAM is theoretical; SOM is your revenue target (1–10% of SAM)
  • BMC has 9 blocks: "Unfair Advantage" is Lean Canvas, NOT BMC
  • Lean Canvas vs BMC: Lean adds Problem, Solution, Key Metrics, Unfair Advantage; removes Customer Relationships, Key Partners, Key Activities, Key Resources
  • Cost vs Impact: Low Impact + High Cost = Time Sink = AVOID
  • CLTV ≥ 3× CAC for sustainable unit economics
  • Sales funnel: Proposal to Win = ~5% conversion
  • NPV positive = viable project; Payback Period = Investment ÷ Annual Cash Flow

  • 🚫 Common Mistakes

  • Treating TAM as expected revenue — TAM is the theoretical ceiling if you had 100% market share
  • Confusing BMC and Lean Canvas blocks — "Unfair Advantage" and "Problem" are Lean Canvas only
  • Forgetting the Lean Canvas is a living document — it should be updated when new evidence emerges
  • Categorising Low Impact + High Cost features as "plan for later" — they are Time Sinks to be avoided
  • Using top-down market sizing alone — always validate with bottom-up analysis
  • Assuming positive revenue means a viable business — if CAC > CLTV, growth accelerates losses
  • Read to the end of the lesson to mark it as read.